tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-84100010970484972002009-02-20T18:58:16.534-08:00nicholashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06002758255095496372noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8410001097048497200.post-89681466901632734492007-05-24T01:37:00.000-07:002007-05-24T01:50:12.118-07:00"...For some users digital photo frames just displaying pictures are appropriate. Then you can keep it simple..."<br />But when you add<br />"...wireless, everything necessarily gets complicated. This means that these products are not suitable for some customers, but some other segments of tech freaks get interested."<br /><br />Reading this comment (3rd comment from post #1) I am curious...<br /><br />Is there a middle ground between what the average user likes and what only a tech geek can handle?<br /><br />What does the average user wish their frame could do that it already doesn't?<br /><br />Nick<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8410001097048497200-8968146690163273449?l=photoshare20.blogspot.com'/></div>nicholashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06002758255095496372noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8410001097048497200.post-1277992388947801212007-05-22T19:55:00.000-07:002007-05-22T20:03:27.435-07:00Hi,<br /><br />In a nut-shell, the purpose of this blog is to discuss the current photo sharing and management and what can be improved in current photo management and photo sharing.<br />Digital photo frames are everywhere, some are pretty cool and feature different web based sharing.<br />So are they ready? Are digital frames cool enough? Are digital frames easy enough?<br /><br />Basically that's it to start...<br /><br />What do you think?<br /><br />Nick<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8410001097048497200-127799238894780121?l=photoshare20.blogspot.com'/></div>nicholashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06002758255095496372noreply@blogger.com3